Archive for Truth

Completed Questions: Experimental Group Voice class

Experimental Group Voice, Keith Rowley

  1. 1.How will this activity attract University of Washington students? This activity will attract UW students by being experientially effective. That is, participants will not only know they have been through an exciting event, they will feel it. This course will expand their range of expression, emotion, feeling, and interrelationships, and in so doing, students will be so excited at their growth they will feel compelled to tell others about it.
  2. Why do you want to teach this class? Because I am excited by the expressive and connecting potential of the human voice. And I want to empower people to explore their humanity, their compassion, and their ability to connect the deepest parts of themselves with the deepest parts of others.
  3. What skills and/or knowledge do you hope the students will gain from the activity? Primarily, I hope students will gain trust in themselves and their classmates. I hope they will learn to trust their own ability to express themselves more fully, trust in their power to overcome any fear of expressing themselves, trust in their ability to share themselves fully with others, and trust in the effectiveness of both opening themselves to others, and being open with others. I hope they learn that by being open to others, by listening to others, and by being committed to the process, they will create something larger than they can alone.
  4. What exercizes will the students participate in? Exercises will include visualization (controlling their emotions), meditation (getting in touch with their emotions), breathing (controlling their voices), calisthenics (enabling a wider range of expression), communication and listening (opening themselves to others), and vocalizing, employing various musical elements such as rhythm, melody, harmony, dissonance, tone/timbre, volume/amplitude, texture (monophonic, polyphonic), etc.
  5. What supplies and/or equipment will the student need to provide? Just their self, their voice, and an open mind, heart, and ears.
  6. What supplies will the student receive? Perhaps some printed inspirational resources, and/or audio CDs.
  7. Please describe your background in this area and your teaching/training background. I have been singing since before I can remember. My family of seven sang rounds together in the car all the time. I have sung in choirs starting in seventh grade, and made the Texas All-State Choir in 1981. I have 20 years experience singing semi-professionally. I have also been teaching at the college level since 2000, and am currently teaching at Bellevue Community College.

Defending Jay Benning. Again. And Well.

In his article "Keeping Kids Stupid: The Intellectual Lynching of Jay Bennish," Michael I. Niman defends Social Studies teacher Jay Bennish's teaching methodology. Definitely worth checking out.

The Fourth Reich: Avoided for Now?

Admittedly, I am not very good at keeping up with the latest news. I mean, I just found this today (from March 11th), about Colorado High School Social Studies teacher Jay Benning being reinstated in his job after originally being placed on leave for comparing certain of PrezBush's Jan 06 State of the Union address to certain sayings of Adolf Hitler. I am happy that Benning is back at work, although, like most news articles, I am not satisfied with the (lack of) depth of explanations. What did the school board determine, exactly?

Well, they did say that Henning must present the opposing argument right then, rather than waiting 'til next week.

God, teachers have it tough. I mean, who determines the polar extents of any particular debate? Is Benning's question simply that Bush is Hitler or is NOT Hitler? And since he's a social studies teacher, here are examples of both arguments?

Well, what if the argument for one side is logically unsound, like the arguments for Intelligent Design? I guess the teacher is supposed to present that argument anyway, as is, and let the students decide.

That's why it's extremely important that students learn how to think critically first. They must have the tools to determine what is a sound argument and what is NOT a sound argument.

Anyway, here's that Post article:

(from Washington Post website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/10/AR2006031002330.html?nav=rss_print/asection"

Colo. Teacher Accused Of Bias Is Reinstated

He Had Likened Bush's Speech to Hitler's

Associated Press
Saturday, March 11, 2006; Page A06

DENVER, March 10 — A high school teacher who was placed on leave after comparing President Bush's State of the Union address to speeches by Adolf Hitler has been reinstated, his attorney and school officials said Friday.

Officials declined to say whether social studies instructor Jay Bennish faced disciplinary action. His attorney, David Lane, said Bennish would be back in the classroom Monday "with full pay."

Bennish had been on paid leave from Overland High School in suburban Aurora since March 1 while Cherry Creek School District determined whether he violated a district rule that teachers present balancing viewpoints in the classroom.

Superintendent Monte Moses declined to offer specifics of the investigation or its findings, but said administrators and Bennish now "have a good understanding."

During a Feb. 1 lecture in a geography class, Bennish said some of Bush's State of the Union address the night before "sounds a lot like the things that Adolf Hitler used to say."

Bennish later said the lecture was intended to stimulate his students to think critically. He also said he presents balancing viewpoints in class but not always at the same time. Lane acknowledged that was a mistake.

"Jay's teaching style will perhaps be, as some would say, a little more fair and balanced on a minute-to-minute basis," Lane said. "When you put out one side, put out the other then and there."

Bennish said he would continue to try to improve as a teacher and to encourage students to think critically.

"I will be back in the classroom on Monday, and I am excited to continue to teach," he said.

One of Bennish's students recorded part of the lecture and provided the tape to a Denver radio station. Cherry Creek administrators said the student's father gave a copy to them.

On Friday, the state Senate rejected a proposal authorizing schools to fire teachers who routinely present one-sided views in the classroom and instead agreed to a measure saying teachers who violate school policies can be dismissed.

the Fourth Reich

Why is nobody pointing out that this is what the Third Reich would have done?

More power to Jay Bennish!!!


(from the CNN.com website:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/03/08/teacher.bush.ap/index.html)

Teacher who compared Bush and Hitler put on leave

Wednesday, March 8, 2006; Posted: 10:17 a.m. EST (15:17 GMT)
DENVER (AP) — A high school social studies teacher who was put on leave after comparing President Bush's State of the Union address to speeches made by Adolf Hitler defended his lecture on Tuesday, saying he was trying to encourage students to think.
“My job as a teacher is to challenge students to think critically about issues that are affecting our world and our society,” Jay Bennish said on NBC's “Today Show.”
Bennish is on paid leave from Overland High School in suburban Aurora while Cherry Creek School District investigates whether his Feb. 1 lecture violated a policy requiring that balancing viewpoints be presented in classes.
A student recorded at least part of the lecture in Bennish's world geography class and took it to a Denver radio station, which played parts of it on a talk show.
Bennish told “Today” the excerpts broadcast weren't representative of the full lecture.
”This is 20 minutes out of a 50-minute class. The rest of the class provides the balance,” he said.
On the recording, Bennish told the students that some of Bush's speech “sounds a lot like the things that Adolf Hitler used to say. We're the only ones who are right, everyone else is backwards and our job is to conquer the world and make sure that they all live just like we want them to.”
Later in the recording, Bennish said he was not claiming Bush and Hitler were the same, “but there are some eerie similarities to the tones that they use.”
Bennish said no parents — including the family of the student who recorded the lecture — have complained to him. He said all the students' parents had seen his syllabus and that school officials had approved it.
”My job as a social studies teacher is to argue alternative perspectives and viewpoints so that students are aware of those point of views. They do not necessarily reflect my own views. They are simply thrown out there to encourage critical thought,” he told “Today.”

Worried about Alito

Why do i not trust Samuel Alito during his Senate confirmation hearings these past couple days? I mean, from what i’ve heard on NPR, he actually sounds like he’d be a fair and impartial Supreme Court Justice…

So what’s wrong? Why do i not feel like i should believe him?

I think i know why: because George Bush Jr nominated him. And knowing who Jr’s appointed to all his other posts, i just cannot trust that Alito would be anything other than cruel, mean, conceited, self-centered, self-righteous, self-serving, lying, cheating, stealing, and murdering.

And that makes me feel bad. Makes me feel disoriented. My head spins with confusion. Because when you’ve been lied to so much, it sucks to hear good words from what seems to be a sincere person. You want to trust him, but you just can’t bring yourself to be open to the lies yet again.

Sucks…

I mean, words are so powerful! Everything is just a story– even science, that most hard-nosed, impersonal, practical and objective of human pursuits, is just a bunch of stories that scientists make up to explain the results of their experiments. And if science is wishy washy, surely every other human pursuit is even moreso.

That is why it’s so important that we be “impeccable with our word.” We must do our best to speak our most ultimate truths all the time, to lift ourselves and each other UP!

Without the most literal, clear, and just meanings of our words, there is NO meaning.

Who Frames the Parameters of the Debate?

Currently Listening
ambient@hyperreal.02 Compilation CD
By Forrest Fang, Stephen Philips, Farfield, Jason Sloan, eM, Numina, Jonathan Hughes, Isomorph, dreamSTATE, Musical Nature, Craig Padilla, JackTheTab, and more Various Artists – Ashera
see related

OK, you know what pisses me off about the Bush administration and people (like this guy Gary Schmitt of the Dallas Morning News, whose article here appears on the Project for a New American Century website) who think our war on Iraq was justified even though we went there based on lies? What pisses me off THE MOST (out of ALOT that pisses me off) about these guys is that they have successfully framed the issue in irrelevant terms. That is, the argument these days is “should we pull out our troops now or later?” when the REAL question is how can we have peace on earth? How can we “all just get along?”

On 9/11, i was as shocked as anybody. Perhaps moreso than most. But my shock led me to question WHY. Why did these people want to do such a thing? So i did a little research. You know, BASIC RESEARCH: hopped on Google, looked up “Osama bin Laden.” Watched alot of TV news (and there was a LOT of it going on at that time).

It didn’t take me long to realize that bin Laden’s main complaint about the USA was that we were meddling in the affairs of his nation (or his nationS) and of the Islamic leadership of those nations.

Ok then, why don’t we try some basic DIPLOMACY??? Send our ambassadors over there to find out how the people feel about us. Ask the PEOPLE. “Let’s talk…” What could we do that might help mend resentment among the people there? LET’S BE FRIENDS!!!

But NO! On the very evening of 9/11, what does our President– the most powerful man in the world, a self-proclaimed “Texan,” the “man of integrity” who during his campaign called himself “the great uniter”– DO??? HE THREATENS EVERYONE!!! “Either you’re with us or you’re against us.” Um, let’s see… we’ve just been attacked by fundamentalists who think that if we’re not friends, we’re enemies. And then we tell them, what? We tell them that if we’re not friends, we’re enemies.

Is this not supremely irrational? I mean, are we not giving bin Laden exactly what he wants? Lending him credence, legitimacy?

George Bush had the perfect opportunity to heal some major wounds for humanity. What if he had said, on that infamous evening of September 11, 2001:

Wow. You have really given us a wakeup call. We had no idea you were in so much pain. The United States takes a vow to make our world a better place, to listen to your concerns, to reach out and LIFT YOU UP, to empower EVERYONE to become the best person they can be, and this wonderful, beautiful, rich and delicate world of ours to be a warm and healthy place for humanity to prosper for millenia to come.

Imagine what our world would be like now, four years later. Ask yourself, Gary Schmitt of the Dallas Morning News, “would the world be safer for having reached out to the poor and the disenfranchised?”